For governments & regulators
AI compute is becoming a siting decision. Canada holds the strong hand.
Jurisdictions are discovering that compute goes where power and water are. We are a private concept — no procurement promises, no Crown partnerships to announce — but the siting thesis is directly relevant to four policy files:
Data sovereignty
Public-sector AI workloads face residency and disclosure obligations that offshore compute cannot meet. We propose capacity designed for PIPEDA, Québec’s Law 25, OSFI B-13 and Bill C-27 from day one — with Canadian-only control planes.
Clean grid alignment
Canada’s grid is already among the cleanest in the G7. AI capacity sited on hydro provinces adds demand without carbon intensity — a natural fit for green industrial policy and provincial renewable-export strategies.
Water stewardship
As water disclosure becomes mandatory south of the border, Canada can set the standard instead of following it: siting rules, watershed-impact reporting, and closed-loop cooling requirements that make Canadian AI capacity the reference case.
Northern & Indigenous economic development
Ten of the thirteen proposed sites are outside major metros, several in Inuit and First Nations territories. Our proposal treats equity participation and local employment as structural, not charitable.
Honesty note: we have not signed agreements with any government, and this page is not a request for funding. It is an offer to share our siting analysis with any ministry or utility that asks.